In the last couple of years, there has been a shift in urban transportation with the rise of dockless vehicle sharing. From e-scooters and e-assist bikes to electronic mopeds. These innovative transportation methods have a common goal, to reduce congestion and carbon emissions in our urban centers in the most convenient and affordable way. Cities around the world are seeing a major change in urban mobility, but are citizens entirely happy about how these companies have gone about implementing dockless vehicle sharing?
Who Are the Major Dockless Vehicle Sharing Companies?
Top E-Scooter Sharing Companies:
Top E-Bike Sharing Companies:
Top E-Moped Sharing Companies:
Pros and Cons of Dockless Vehicle Sharing
No matter what, dockless transportation companies will find success as a fun way to travel around a city, especially for tourists. The main intent behind scooter, bike, and moped sharing is to cut down on carbon emissions and traffic congestion in the busy city hubs. Other than these obvious benefits, a major pro to dockless vehicle sharing is convenience. Riders can pick up and leave their dockless vehicle anywhere.
However, dockless vehicle sharing has had a negative impact on pedestrian traffic when taken on sidewalks and walkways causing major congestion, which could result in safety issues. As long as cities are equipped with bike lanes and wide sharing paths, they should be easily shared.
One of the major benefits of dockless vehicle sharing is the ability to pick them up and leave them anywhere. This system allows riders to travel right to their destination, but many cities have seen the mayhem and disorganization this can cause. However, at what point do we hold consumers responsible? After all, they are the ones throwing them into rivers and piling them up on sidewalks.
Although new dockless vehicle sharing apps have specific algorithms that try to force riders to leave vehicles out of the way and organized, they still have a ways to go. Hopefully, with enough rider education and dockless vehicle regulation, this issues will improve.
Another issue regarding rider safety is the availability of helmets. Helmets have are placed with the vehicles but seem to be lost or damaged resulting in many riders not using helmets at all. Should the rider be responsible for there own helmet or is it entirely up to the company?
Ultimately, serious changes should be made to rider safety, the storage of these vehicles, and their effects on traffic flow for both vehicles and pedestrians. Only then will the dockless vehicle craze be a complete success.
Currently, dockless vehicle sharing isn't perfect but the alternative is no better. There needs to be better safety regulations, a better legal initiative against vandalism and better legislation to balance supply and demand in a way that caters to the needs of each city. Then, there will be a bright future for dockless vehicle sharing and the innovation of urban mobility.